Bradley v. Waterfront Commission
New York Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Yaw Yooehis, J. (dissenting).
My view of this appeal is that which is taken by counsel to the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor, viz., that with the exception of the extension of the Waterfront Commission Act to cover employees who have been convicted of felonies, the constitutional objections to section 8 as amended by chapter 211 of the Laws of 1961 are entirely *281hypothetical. In this respect the Waterfront Commission’s brief states as follows:
“ Section 8, as amended, is a statute with numerous aspects affecting persons in many different situations. Some persons will be affected by the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- New Jersey v. SargentSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Self-Insurer's Ass'n v. State Industrial CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- MATTER OF PETERS v. New York City Hous. Auth.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Red Robin Stores, Inc. v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Reed v. LittletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.