Legal Opinion
Peter Brentz Smith
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana
Decided March 18, 2024No. 9:23-bk-90002Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MONTANA In re PETER BRENTZ SMITH, Case No. 9:23-bk-90002-BPH Debtor. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION I. Introduction. In this Chapter 7 case, Debtor objected to creditor California Franchise Tax Board’s (“FTB’s”) Proof of Claim No. 7-1 in the amount of $132,439.12 on the Claims Register (“FTB Claim”). Debtor argues that FTB inaccurately assessed tax liabilities incurred in the years 2008 and 2009. Debtor now challenges those assessments. For the reasons stated below, Debtor’s objection is overruled and the FTB Claim is allowed in its…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Raleigh v. Illinois Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Karla SCHIKORE, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. BANKAMERICA SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- In Re Daniel R. Bucknum, Dba Bucknum, Levine & Smith, Debtor. Joe W. Moody, Bernice H. Moody v. Daniel R. Bucknum, Dba Bucknum, Levine & SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Bates v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Boruff v. Cook Inlet Energy LLC (In Re Cook Inlet Energy LLC)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.