Legal Opinion

Norbom Engineering Co. v. A. H. Cox & Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1922No. 17175PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald J., entered January 17,1922, upon granting a nonsuit, dismissing an action on contract, tried to the court and a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

—Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal for the reason that no notice of appeal was served upon the surety on the cost bond furnished upon demand of the respondent because appellant is a nonresident corporation.

Upon the trial, a nonsuit was granted and judgment of dismissal, with costs, ordered against appellant and against the surety. Respondent’s costs were there*676after taxed at $38.20. From the judgment of dismissal, this appeal is taken, and appellant did not serve a copy of its notice of appeal upon its surety.

The surety company had no interest in the litigation except as it was liable…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. Brookdale Mills, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  2. Mogelberg v. CalhounWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Love, Warren & Monroe Co. v. EnnisWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Robertson Mortgage Co. v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Whitlock v. HicksIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Meade v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Western MacHinery Company, a Corporation v. Northwestern Improvement Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  3. Du Pont Cellophane Co. v. KinneyWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Davis Lumber Co. v. Pacific Lumber AgencyWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Stone-Easter, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API