Legal Opinion

Meade v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1944No. 29265PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

Plaintiff, who owns 8,845 shares of stock in Pacific Fruit & Produce Company, brought this action under the provisions of § 61 of the Delaware corporation statute, § 2093, p. 480, Revised Code of Delaware 1935, for the appointment by the King county superior court of a third appraiser who, together with two others previously appointed by the respective parties to the action, should determine the value of plaintiff’s shares of stock. The provision reads as follows:

“Sec. 61. Consolidation or Merger; Payment for Stock of Dissatisfied Stockholder: — If any stockholder in any corporation of this…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Guaranty Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Jones v. Missouri-Edison Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. Kimball v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  4. Peters v. United States Mortgage CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1921
  5. Beard v. BeardOregon Supreme Court · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fuller v. OstruskeWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Meade v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1947
  3. State Ex Rel. Starkey v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Grant v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1944
  5. State Ex Rel. Starkey v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API