Legal Opinion

Novice v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of America

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided January 19, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoner arth, J.

Defendant moves for summary judgment, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, dismissing the complaint herein, which seeks to recover benefits for a claimed total disability under defendant’s policy or certificate. Plaintiff was insured against any one of certain losses, “ which is the direct and proximate result of and which is caused solely and exclusively by external, violent and accidental means ”.

On June 4, 1949, plaintiff, while driving an automobile, was involved in a collision with another car, whereby he sustained certain injuries and claims this accident resulted in his…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Curry v. MacKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. McGrail v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Insurance Co. v. RodelSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Leland v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sugarman v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1962
  2. Emanuel v. Colonial Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of America v. HawkesworthDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API