Legal Opinion

Beetchenow v. Bartholet

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1931No. 22837. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This proceeding presents a controversy over the waters of a stream for irrigation purposes. The trial to the court without a jury resulted in findings of fact from which it was concluded that Walter R. Beetchenow and wife were entitled to the amount of water which they claimed. Judgment was rendered in accordance with the findings and conclusions. Subsequently, a motion to vacate the judgment was made and overruled. The state supervisor of hydraulics appeals from the judgment and from the order overruling the motion to vacate.

Johnson creek is a small stream in Okanogan county, flowing into…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Brown v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Quareles v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. State v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Barthrop v. TuckerWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Osborn v. ChaseWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Humphrey v. Bankers Mortg. Co. of Topeka, Kan.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  2. State v. HawkIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Gossett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Cinebar Coal & Coke Co. v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Johns v. ErhartCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API