Legal Opinion

Barthrop v. Tucker

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1902No. 4141PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from. Superior Court, Clallam County. — Hon. George O. Hatch, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court- was delivered by .

Dunbar, J.

This- is a proceeding under §§ 462 and 463, 2 Hill’s Code, for the purpose of reviving a judgment. The motion alleges- that the judgment was entered on the *6675th day of June, 3895, and the judgment decreed the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien upon certain lots in the city of Port Angeles for a certain sum, with interest at the rate of eight per cent, per'annum. After a general denial, the respondent, as a second defense, alleged that the judgment was not rendered, given, or entered within six years prior to. thei filing of said motion to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Quareles v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Sears v. KilbourneWashington Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Brown v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Garrett v. ByerlyWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Kinsley v. New Vulture Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1907
  4. State of Arizona v. GriffithArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Cinebar Coal & Coke Co. v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API