Legal Opinion

Riccio v. International Railway Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motioh for a new trial by the defendant upon the court’s minutes.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for personal injuries, claimed to have been received by him while alighting from one of defendant’s street oars, caused by the sudden starting of the car, by which it is alleged he was thrown to the pavement.

It appears from the evidence on behalf of the plaintiff that, for several days prior to the accident, he had been employed by the defendant as a laborer, engaged with others in constructing tracks in a neighboring street near the place of the accident; that he received one dollar and seventy-five cents a day for his labor, and was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vick v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Forton v. Crosstown Street Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kent v. Jamestown Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API