Forton v. Crosstown Street Railway Co.
New York Supreme Court
Motion for new trial on the court’s minutes.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
The plaintiff recovered a verdict in this action for injuries received by him while acting as motorman on one of the defendant’s electric cars. The accident happened on a stormy, rainy night. The plaintiff claims that, owing to the absence of proper hangers, he was unable to hang a curtain at the window of the car which was between the vestibule in which he stood and that part of the car used by passengers; that, owing to the absence of this curtain, the vestibule was flooded with light and prevented him from seeing ahead of the car into the darkness any considerable distance, which he…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Funk v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Sams v. St. Louis & Meramec River RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- Lundquist v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- McLeod v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Stocks v. St. Louis Transit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1904
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kent v. Jamestown Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Simons v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Riccio v. International Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1909