Legal Opinion

Vick v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 1884PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The recovery in this action is based upon the ground that at the time of the accident, which resulted in the death of the plaintiff's intestate, he was a passenger upon the defendant's car and not an employe. This is the most important question arising upon this appeal, for if the deceased was an employe, and, at the time he received his injury, in the service of the defendant, then the action cannot be maintained, and the court below erred in refusing to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant, as well as in denying the motion for a nonsuit, and in not holding, as requested, that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Russell v. . the Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Claim of Kowalek v. New York Consolidated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Ewald v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. Knorr v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Jones v. Casualty Reciprocal Exch.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API