Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Morris

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 12, 1990No. 70,934PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAIRD, Judge.

Applicant was convicted of the offense of forgery. Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 32.21(a)(1)(A). After finding the enhancement allegation “true,” the jury assessed punishment at twenty years and a fine of ten thousand dollars. Applicant filed a motion to dismiss her appeal in this cause, and the Court of Appeals granted the request. Morris v. State, No. 11-88-199-CR (Tex.App. — Eastland delivered April 6, 1989).

In her application for writ of habeas corpus, see Art. 11.07 Tex.Code Crim.Proc. Ann., applicant submits that the indictment upon which she was convicted is fundamentally…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Studer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Ex Parte BiltonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Ex Parte GibsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Cotton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Duron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Teal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  4. Ex Parte MatthewsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Manemann v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API