Kilpack v. Wignall
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Justice:
Plaintiff, Jerald Kilpack, appeals the denial of his motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial. A jury found that defendants LaMark and David Wignall were not negligent in connection with an accident occurring on a farm that caused injuries to plaintiff’s minor son, Jess Kilpack. The issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred as a matter of law in denying plaintiff’s motions. We hold that the trial court erred in not granting the motion for - a judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
The accident in which Jess Kilpack was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schwartz v. Helms Bakery LimitedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Shannon v. Butler Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Balle v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1932
- Koer v. Mayfair MarketsUtah Supreme Court · 1967
- Byron T. Weeks, Guardian Ad Litem of Valerie Weeks, a Minor v. Latter-Day Saints Hospital, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- DCR INC. v. Peak Alarm Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
- DeBry v. Cascade EnterprisesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Broberg v. HessCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Doe v. HafenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Allstate Insurance v. PattersonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.