Legal Opinion

Kilpack v. Wignall

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1979No. 16175PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

Plaintiff, Jerald Kilpack, appeals the denial of his motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial. A jury found that defendants LaMark and David Wignall were not negligent in connection with an accident occurring on a farm that caused injuries to plaintiff’s minor son, Jess Kilpack. The issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred as a matter of law in denying plaintiff’s motions. We hold that the trial court erred in not granting the motion for - a judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

The accident in which Jess Kilpack was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Helms Bakery LimitedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Shannon v. Butler Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Balle v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Koer v. Mayfair MarketsUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Byron T. Weeks, Guardian Ad Litem of Valerie Weeks, a Minor v. Latter-Day Saints Hospital, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. DCR INC. v. Peak Alarm Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. DeBry v. Cascade EnterprisesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Broberg v. HessCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  4. Doe v. HafenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  5. Allstate Insurance v. PattersonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API