Legal Opinion

State v. . Shu

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 30, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

The only question presented by this appeal is whether the State’s evidence was of sufficient probative force to warrant its submission to the jury. An examination of the record leads us to the conclusion that defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit should have been allowed.

The State’s evidence tended to show that on the night of 24 April, 1940, about 2 :30 a.m., Stonestreet’s Cafe in Mooresville was broken and entered, and goods stolen therefrom, entrance being effected by breaking the glass of the front door. A small safe was removed and thrown out nearby, unopened. There was blood on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. . PrinceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. State v. . GoodsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. State v. . PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  4. State v. . MontagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. State v. . MaddenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. . CoffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. State v. HovisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. State v. CoffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. State v. . PenrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. State v. BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API