Legal Opinion

State v. Burton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1968No. 504PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

The principal question presented for decision is whether the possession by defendants, under the conditions stated, of the identical instrument used in the safecracking was sufficient to repel their motions for nonsuit.

Our research does not reveal a case in this jurisdiction where possession of tools used to effect a burglary or a safecracking was the sole evidence relied upon by the State.

There is ample evidence that someone “did, by the use of a crowbar and other tools force open a safe of General Electric Supply Company, 18 Seaboard Ave., Raleigh, N. C.” on 17 January 1967, and that three…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. State v. . PrinceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. State v. . StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. State v. . MintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. State v. . HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. TriplettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API