Treister v. City of Miami
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARCUS, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendants’ Restated and Amended Motion for Dismissal or Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a (Second) Amended Complaint. Before us at this time are various constitutional claims contained in Count V of the [First] Amended Complaint (DE 17). The state law claims contained in Counts I-IV of the Amended Complaint were remanded to the state courts and resolved. The primary issue at this juncture is the preclusive effect of the state court ruling as to the state claims upon the federal constitutional claims…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wilkinson v. Pitkin County Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- BFI Waste Systems of North America v. Dekalb CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004
- City of Pompano Beach v. Yardarm Restaurant, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002