Legal Opinion

State v. Minkel

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1975No. File 11469PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINANS, Justice.

The petitioner in this appeal, Dean Minkel, was convicted of violating SDCL 32-34-3 and 5, which set forth the duty of a vehicle operator to stop in the case of an accident and give information and render aid.

At his trial the only evidence offered by the prosecution to prove the hit-and-run offense was a stipulation stating what the investigating officer would have said if he had been present in Court. In substance, the stipulation stated that petitioner, while driving his motor vehicle, struck a man on a bicycle causing him to crash to the ground resulting in his injury and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. HolfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State Ex Rel. Burns v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State v. BatesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State v. SnellNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Crew v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State v. McCaffertySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. NunnIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Kimoktoak v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. WilsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. AndrewsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API