State v. Minkel
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WINANS, Justice.
The petitioner in this appeal, Dean Minkel, was convicted of violating SDCL 32-34-3 and 5, which set forth the duty of a vehicle operator to stop in the case of an accident and give information and render aid.
At his trial the only evidence offered by the prosecution to prove the hit-and-run offense was a stipulation stating what the investigating officer would have said if he had been present in Court. In substance, the stipulation stated that petitioner, while driving his motor vehicle, struck a man on a bicycle causing him to crash to the ground resulting in his injury and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. HolfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Burns v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. BatesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. SnellNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
- Crew v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- State v. McCaffertySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. NunnIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Kimoktoak v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. WilsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. AndrewsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.