Morgan v. Southern California Rapid Transit District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
Defendant, Southern California Rapid Transit District (RTD), appeals from a default judgment entered after its answer to the complaint was stricken for violating discovery orders. We reverse and remand.
Facts and Proceedings Below
Plaintiff, Phillip Morgan, was injured in an accident involving an RTD bus. He sued the RTD for negligence. The RTD denied liability. It contended the accident resulted from the bus driver’s sudden, unforeseeable loss of consciousness and nothing in the driver’s medical history or physical examinations suggested he would black out while driving a bus.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Greenup v. RodmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Deyo v. KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Becker v. S.P v. Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Caryl Richards, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Fairfield v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Schwab v. Rondel Homes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1991
- Sickle v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Sauer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Parish v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- In Re Marriage of NiklasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.