Legal Opinion

Sampson v. Andrus

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided January 24, 1980No. Civ. 78-3017PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CASE SUMMARY

DONALD J. PORTER, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks by this action to obtain declaratory and mandatory relief from the Department of the Interior’s refusal to consider plaintiff’s application for the partition of her trust allotment on the Cheyenne River Indian Reservation in South Dakota. Defendant contends that it cannot consider plaintiff’s application unless the other co-tenant in the allotment, plaintiff’s sister, joins in the application. Plaintiff argues that under the relevant statutes, a co-tenant’s approval is unnecessary. Both parties made Motions for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. First National Bank in St. Louis v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Wilbur v. United States Ex Rel. KadrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Hill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. Rural Electrification Administration v. Northern States Power CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  5. People of State of Ill. Ex Rel. Scott v. HoffmanDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harriott v. AshcroftDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Nebraska Public Power District v. 100.95 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1982
  3. Oglala Sioux Tribe of Pine Ridge Indian Reservation v. HallettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  4. Bordeaux v. HuntDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1985
  5. Oglala Sioux Tribe of Pine Ridge Indian Reservation v. HallettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API