Hill v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Hill commenced this action in the district court against the United States, the Civil Service Commission, and individual government officials seeking a writ of mandate, declaratory relief, and damages for the allegedly wrongful refusal of the Army and the Civil Service Commission to convert him to “career-conditional” status during his temporary civilian employment with the Army in Yokohama, Japan. After a non-jury trial, the district judge concluded that none of the defendants had acted illegally and ruled in their favor. We have examined important questions of federal…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Gregory v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Leonhard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Johnsrud v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Gregory v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Ministerio Roca Solida v. United States Department of Fish & WildlifeDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2013
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.