Legal Opinion

Booth v. Drainage District No. 3

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. Bailey Lee, J.

Certain settlers filed with the court their petition praying the organization of Drainage District No. 3 in Ada county. Appellants protested, and the court made a temporary order organizing the district and excluding from the territory as proposed the New York Canal. Ultimately, the commissioners filed their report to which appellants filed an original and later an amended remonstrance. The issues were tried, and on July 8, 1924, the court rendered its order and judgment confirming such report and finally organizing the district. ’ Remonstrants have appealed from said order and judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. New Mexico v. United States Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Board of Directors of Modesto Irrigation District v. TregeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Oregon Short Line Railroad v. Pioneer Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Burt v. Farmers' Co-Operative Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Burt v. Farmers' Co-Operative Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peninsula Drainage District No. 2 v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State Ex Rel. Wright v. C. C. Anderson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API