Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Parcel Services, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AFTER BENCH TRIAL AND INJUNCTION WITH TEMPORARY STAY PENDING APPEAL
ALSUP, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this case under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. 12101, et seq., the issue is whether applicants with excellent vision in one eye but little or no vision in the other may be categorically excluded by United Parcel Service, Inc., from any and all driver positions regardless of their actual safety records and driving abilities. The issue is not whether an individual’s vision may be a factor in assessing his or her qualification for such a…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- James Mcdonald v. Western-Southern Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Jana L. Morton v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Bates v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Bryan v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
- McDonald v. Western-Southern Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.