Legal Opinion

Warmack v. Arnold

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 2011No. C-100718PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Timothy Arnold, appeals the judgment of the Hamilton County Municipal Court in favor of plaintiff-appellee State Auto Insurance Company of Ohio (“State Auto”) on its claim for subrogation. The judgment was entered following a bench trial.

{¶ 2} In its complaint against Arnold, State Auto asserted that it had provided collision-insurance coverage to plaintiff-appellee Richard L. Warmack. State Auto alleged that pursuant to that insurance policy, it had been “required to and did pay to and/or on behalf of its Insured the sum of $4,075.00 under the Collision coverage…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Aultman Hospital Ass'n v. Community Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. Guman Bros. FarmOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Bogan v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Engleson v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  2. McDonald v. Asset Acceptance LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
  3. Huttenbauer Land Co., L.L.C. v. Harley Riley, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. JAG Imperial, L.L.C. v. LiterskiOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API