Legal Opinion
Crum v. Lane Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 25, 1926No. 328PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On June 24, 1924, W. E. Williams, under the name of Cascade Products Company, entered into a contract with the Lane Company, appellee, as follows:
"Aristocrat Line.
Date Sold. Date billed. 6 — 24 — 24. No. _____. Salesman E. J. Ferguson.
Terms. Ship to the Lane Company. Reg. Town and state, Waco, Texas.
Rating. Ledger. Ship by M., K. T.
"Special Agency Agreement.
"Company hereby grants the undersigned dealer the sales right for the Aristocrat Line, for the period of this agency agreement of one year from date hereof.
Quan. Volts. Cur. Cyc. Goods shipped for special campaign. Retail at Total Retail.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Utah Lake Irr. Co. v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 1924
- Wellington Railroad Committee v. CrawfordTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- Buchanan v. WrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Metropolitan Nat. Bank v. VanderpoolCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- First State Bank v. Hidalgo Land Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lane Co. v. CrumTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- State Trading Corp. v. Addis, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Beaver County1939