Legal Opinion

Hiatt v. Hiatt

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1867PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Grant Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

— Suit by the appellees against the appellant on the following obligation:

“May 8th, A. I). 1854. Know ye, that I, Esther Hiatt, do hereby bind myself to stand between Jesse and Elam Hiatt, and secure Jesse and Elam from any loss whatever by Eli Hiatt, in case the said Jesse and Elam would go Eli’s security on guardian’s bond for Elijah and. Nathan Hiatt.
“Esther Hiatt.”

The complaint alleges, inter alia, that the obligation, was *54given in consideration that the plaintifis- would become the sureties of' Eli Hiatt on his bond as guardian of Elijah and Nathan Hiatt, who- were infants, and for the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burke v. MeadIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Howard v. AdkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. ForsythIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Wills v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API