Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Principal Financial Group

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided September 20, 2007No. Civil Action 07-cv-01741-LTBPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, District Judge.

This disability benefits case is before me on Plaintiff, Tess Peterson’s, Motion to Remand [Docket # 8], Defendants, Principal Financial Group, Target Corporation, Target Corporation Benefits Trust II, and State Street Bank and Trust’s (collectively “Target”), Response [Docket # 14], and Plaintiffs Reply [Docket # 15]. Oral arguments would not materially assist the determination of this motion. After consideration of the motion, pleadings, and the case file, and for the reasons stated below, I DENY Plaintiffs motion [Docket #8].

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Eugene Dalton v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  2. John F. Roberto v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Sandra K. Rucker, Herbert Rucker, Cheryl Dunham, Etc., and James Dunham v. Wabash Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  4. Time Warner Entertainment Co. v. Everest Midwest Licensee, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  5. Sierra Club v. Seaboard Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Van Arsdel v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API