Legal Opinion

Knudson v. Bockwinkle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1922No. 17070PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— Upon the conclusion of the evidence in the trial of this case, the trial judge dismissed the action as to the Bothell Bus Company, a corporation, and made findings and conclusions establishing the negligence of appellants and the freedom from negligence of respondent, rendering judgment accordingly.

Appellants assign a number of errors, among others, the dismissal of the Bothell Bus Company, the finding of the freedom from contributory negligence of the respondent, and the findings and conclusions holding appellants guilty of negligence.

Respondent was driving his automobile south towards…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thoresen v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Rorabaugh v. Great Eastern Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Madden v. Nippon Auto Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Anderson v. McLarenWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Spencer v. MagriniWashington Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Murphy v. HawthorneOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Ritter v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Baldwin v. MittryIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Williamson v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  5. Rust v. SchlaitzerWashington Supreme Court · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API