Legal Opinion

Matter of Murray Hill Bank

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1897PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 5, 1897, reversing an order of Special Term which dissolved a banking corporation, and also dismissing a proceeding instituted for the voluntary dissolution of said bank.

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 5, 1897, reversing an order of Special Term which dissolved a banking corporation, and also dismissing a proceeding instituted for the voluntary dissolution of said bank. On the 11th of August, 1896, the superintendent of the banking department, considering a banking corporation, known as the Murray Hill Bank, to be in an unsound and unsafe condition to do banking business, closed its doors and took possession of its property. He at once caused an examination to be made into the…

1Opinion of the CourtVann, J.

The Appellate Division based its determination upon the ground that the proceeding for a voluntary dissolution of the Murray Hill Bank, instituted by its directors, abated upon the entry of a judgment dissolving said corporation in the action brought by the attorney-general. We think this is a sound conclusion, and that it is so well supported by the reasoning of the learned justice who prepared the prevailing opinion as to make further discussion of the subject unnecessary. (14 App. Div. 318.) We should affirm the order now before us for review upon that opinion, but for the fact that it…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Townsend v. LittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Crane v. ReederMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Isham v. Bennington Iron Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1847
  4. Titcomb v. Union Marine & Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
  5. In re Majority of the Directors of Murray Hill BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Valley Bank v. MalcolmArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State Ex Rel. Short v. NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. East End Trust Co. v. OttenNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. McDavid v. Bank of Bay MinetteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Hanson v. SognSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API