In re Majority of the Directors of Murray Hill Bank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
• Appeal by Frederick D. Kilburn, Superintendent of Banks of the State of New York, and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the N ew York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 2d day of September, 1896, appointing temporary receivers of the Murray Hill Bank. The facts are more fully stated in the dissenting opinion of Williams,. J.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, J. :
This was a special proceeding commenced under section 2419 of the Code of Civil Procedure for a voluntary dissolution of the Murray Hill Bank. A petition for such voluntary dissolution was presented to the court on the 28th day of August, 1896, and an order was then granted requiring the Attorney-General to show cause, on the first day of September, why an order should not be made as provided for by section 2423 of the Code, and why a temporary receiver of the property of the corporation should not be appointed. Due service of a copy of the order to show cause, with the petition…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re Santa Eulalia Silver Min. Co.New York Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matter of Murray Hill BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- In re Majority of the Directors of The Murray Hill BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- In re Directors of Murray Hill BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896