Legal Opinion
Airship Industries (UK) Ltd. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 8, 1986No. 86 Civ. 1707 (RWS)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (“Goodyear”), has brought a motion pursuant to Rule 12, Fed.R.Civ.P., to dismiss the complaint filed by plaintiffs Airship Industries (UK) Ltd. and Airship Industries (USA), Inc. (collectively “Airship”). For the following reasons the motion will be denied in part and granted in part.
The Parties
Airship designs, manufactures and operates lighter-than-air “airships,” also commonly known as “blimps.” During the 1980s, blimps produced by Airship have been used for a variety of commercial and military purposes. A significant…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Guard-Life Corp. v. S. Parker Hardware Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- First City National Bank and Trust Company v. Freddy L. Simmons, and Herman Carter MoodyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. ParisienDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Xerox Corp. v. Apple Computer, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1990
- Gilbert, Segall and Young v. Bank of MontrealDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Resnick v. ResnickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.