Legal Opinion

John Madsen, et al. v. Heather D’Andrea Fish, et al.

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided January 14, 2026No. 3:25-cv-00091Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA JOHN MADSEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HEATHER D’ANDREA FISH, et al., Case No. 3:25-cv-00091-SLG Defendants. HEATHER D’ANDREA FISH, et al., Counter-Claimants, v. JOHN MADSEN, Counter-Defendant. ORDER ON THREE PENDING MOTIONS This order addresses three motions currently pending before the Court: 1. At Docket 33 is Defendants/Counter-Claimants Heather D' Andrea Fish and David Fish’s (the “Fishes”) First Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.1 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant John Madsen responded in opposition at Docket 44,2 to which the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API