Legal Opinion

Barfield v. Wright

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 29, 1970No. 4 Div. 400PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARWOOD, Justice.

The complaint below as originally filed contained two counts. Both counts claimed damages resulting from a collision between the defendant’s automobile and that of the plaintiff. Count 1 averred the negligent operation of defendant’s automobile, and Count 2 asserted that plaintiff’s damages resulted from the wanton operation of defendant’s automobile.

The defendant’s demurrer to the complaint being overruled, the defendant then pleaded the general issue in short by consent with leave to give in evidence any matter in defense which might be specially pleaded but not to include…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Boyette v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. Nelson v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. McRee v. Woodward Iron CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  5. Southern Railway Company v. TerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1959

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dixie Highway Express, Inc. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  2. Harper v. Baptist Medical Center-PrincetonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Chambliss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  4. Giles v. GardnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  5. Thompson v. JarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API