Boyette v. Bradley
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The appeal is in a double aspect — from the original judgment, arid from that overruling the motion for a new trial. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. Co. v. Lowe, 208 Ala. 12, 93 South. 765; Lewis v. Martin, 210 Ala. 401. 98 South. 635.
The complaint contained counts for simple and subsequent negligence and for wantonness on defendants’ part. Defendants pleaded the general issue and contributory negligence.
After the parties were iu the automobile, plaintiff states, on cross-examination, what happened, as follows:
“We hadn’t driven any way from the house .before commencing to turn across the…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. DrennenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Georgia Cotton Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Tanner's v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Wilson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942
- Blount Brothers Construction Company v. RoseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- Mobile Light R. Co. v. GadikSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Adler v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Williams v. WickerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.