Legal Opinion
Schuman v. Teague
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 23, 1945No. 31669PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This cause is presented on appeal from a judgment of the court of common pleas of Tulsa county, Okla., holding and adjudicating that the plaintiff, Joe Schuman, a lumber dealer at Tulsa, did not have a materialman’s lien on property owned by Delbert Teague and Mrs. Delbert Teague.
The cause was instituted in the court of common pleas on July 2, 1942, by Joe Schuman, as plaintiff, against Delbert Teague, Mrs. Delbert Teague, Lee Morgan, and T. D. Sexton, as defendants.
T. D. Sexton was the owner of a mortgage on the property. He was not served with summons and therefore was not a party in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dolese Bros. Co. v. AndrecopulasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Huttig Sash & Door Co. v. StittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1914
- Rogers v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Mobley v. Leeper Bros. Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
3Cited by7 opinions
- Layrite Products Company v. LuxIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- McGlumphy v. Jetero Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- M & M ENTERPRISES v. KaulSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Green v. ReeseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Green v. ReeseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.