Huttig Sash & Door Co. v. Stitt
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Petition for Revision of Proceedings of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas, in Bankruptcy; Edward R. Meek, Judge. Petition to superintend and revise ah order of the District Court in favor of J. W. Stitt, trustee in bankruptcy of the Texas Planing Mill & Manufacturing Company, denying the right of petitioner, the Huttig Sash & Door Company, to a lien on property held by the trustee.
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Circuit Judge.
[1] We do not think that the motion to dismiss the petition' to superintend and revise ’ is well taken. The ground stated in the motion is that the proper remedy open to petitioner was an appeal under subdivision “a” of section 25 of the Bankruptcy Act, and not a petition to superintend and revise under subdivision “b” of section 24’ of that act. The claim filed by the petitioner against the bankrupt estate was for the sum of $1,484.30, $1,157 of which he claimed was secured by a lien on property held by the trustee in bankruptcy. The total amount claimed was allowed as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coder v. ArtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Hutchinson v. OtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Matter of LovingSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Holden v. StrattonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Bassett v. MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- First National Bank in Dallas v. Whirlpool Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1974
- Smith v. Texas Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Wuerpel v. Commercial Germania Trust & Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1916
- Tavernaro v. Pioneer Credit RecoveryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- J. M. Radford Grocery Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.