Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Altman
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 12, 1972No. 966-1PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Farris, A.C.J.
The Colemans brought action to recover for personal injuries sustained by Mrs. Coleman when she was struck at approximately 7:30 p.m. on December 13, 196.8, by an automobile driven by Mr. Altman. It is not disputed that Mrs. Coleman suffered extensive injuries. The accident occurred on a rainy night in the city of Snohomish on Second Street near its intersection with Bowen Street. Second Street runs in an easterly-westerly direction. Bowen Street runs in a northwesterly-southeasterly direction intersecting with, but not crossing through, Second Street.
An independent witness…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Moosman v. Joseph P. Blitz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Walsh v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- Voisin v. LukeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966
- Frankel v. International Scrap Iron and Metal Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Levy v. North American Co. for Life & Health InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Reid Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Bellevue PropertiesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Lakes v. von der MehdenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Melby v. Hawkins Pontiac, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Lakes v. VondermehdenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.