State Of Washington v. Sayiden H. Mohamed
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1
Trickey, J.
A jury convicted Sayiden Mohamed of two counts of third degree assault. Mohamed thereafter moved for a new trial based on the admission of his prior convictions under Evidence Rule (ER) 806. The trial court granted the motion, concluding that the admission was contrary to a Court of Appeals, Division Two decision, State v. Lucas, 167 Wn. App. 100, 271 P.3d 394 (2012). The State appeals the trial court’s ruling.
¶2 The defense expert witness testified about Mohamed’s out-of-court statements. The State contends that Mohamed’s statements were offered to prove the truth of the matter…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- In re the Detention of CoeWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Detention of Marshall v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. JackmanWashington Supreme Court · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MohamedWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. MohamedWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. MohamedWashington Supreme Court · 2016