State v. Mohamed
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtYu, J.
¶1 This case requires us to determine whether it is permissible to impeach a hearsay declarant with his or her prior convictions under certain circumstances. ER 806 allows for impeachment of a hearsay declarant as if the declarant were a testifying witness. In this case, the defendant did not testify and his own out-of-court statements were admitted into evidence through his expert witness’ testimony. Defense counsel expressly declined a limiting instruction offered by the trial court regarding the purpose of the defendant’s statements. The State then cross-examined the expert witness with…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. GrisbyWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Lockwood v. a C & S, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. BoyerWashington Supreme Court · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. LopezWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. OutlandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- State Of Washington, V. Brennaris Marquis JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
- Ogunbanwo (Olaitan) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2021
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. THOMAS H. OUTLAND (14-08-0751, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.