Richardson v. Halbekann
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
THIS action by plaintiff Halbekann seeks a decree quieting title in him as against the defendant Richardson to certain Denver city lots. In his opening brief defendant Richardson says that the controlling question for decision is the alleged erroneous admission by the trial court of a certain tax deed offered by the plaintiff Halbekann. Richardson further says if his objection thereto is good, the judgment must be reversed; if not good, it should be affirmed. In view of this statement of plaintiff in error we confine our discussion solely to the one question of the admissibility of the tax…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- City & County of Denver v. BachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ford v. GenereuxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
- Bald Eagle Mining and Refining Company v. BruntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Lake Canal Reservoir Co. v. BeetheSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- Colpitts v. FastenauSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
- Brown v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.