Brasfield v. W. C. Powell & Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
CONTROVERSY submitted without action, in Wake Superior Court, and heard at Chambers, April 11, 1895, before Starbuck, J., who gave judgment for the plaintiff, and defendants apjiealed. The facts appear in the opinion of Associate Justice Furohbs.
1Opinion of the Court
Eurches, J.:
This case comes before us from a judgment upon a case agreed.
One Bailey, being indebted to plaintiff’s intestate, executed to him a mortgage on his crop, to be grown in 1894, which was duly probated and registered on the 15th day of January, 1894. Bailey, being indebted to defendants to the amount of $126.19, and desiring to obtain advances to the amount of $185 from defendants to enable him to make and gather his crop for 1894, executed to defendants an agricultural lien under the statute, upon his crop to be grown in 1894, to the amount of $185. And in the same instrument, a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hinton v. . LeighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Wooten v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wrought Iron Range Co. v. CarverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- North State Piano Co. v. SpruillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Avery County Bank v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Bank v. Vass.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Hardy v. . AbdallahSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.