Legal Opinion

Wooten v. . Hill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1887PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Civil action, tried .upon a case agreed, before Philips, Judge, at August Term, 1887, of the Superior Court of Lenoir county. There was judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiffs appealed. The action was originally commenced in the Court of a justice of the peace, and was carried by appeal to the Superior Court.

Read the full summary

Civil action, tried .upon a case agreed, before Philips, Judge, at August Term, 1887, of the Superior Court of Lenoir county. There was judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiffs appealed. The action was originally commenced in the Court of a justice of the peace, and was carried by appeal to the Superior Court. The facts agreed are, substantially, that the plaintiffs are the surviving partners of J. S. Wooten & Bro., and this action was commenced to recover money had and received by the defendant to the use of the plaintiffs; that on the 1st day of January, 1886, one W. J. Watkins…

1Opinion of the Court

Davis, J.,

(after stating the case). Section 1799 of The Code provides: “If any person shall make any advancement either in money or supplies, to any person who is engaged in, or about to engage in, the cultivation of the soil, the person so making such advances shall be entitled to a lien on the crops which may be made during the year upon the land in the cultivation, of which the advances so made have been expended, in preference to all other liens existing or otherwise, to the extent of such advances,” &c., provided an agreement therefor shall be executed in the mode prescribed.

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lehigh Water Co. v. EastonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. O'Kelly v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. Robinson, Probate Judge v. . Ezzell, RegisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  4. Dail Bro. v. . FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  5. Harris v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Burr v. . MaultsbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. McNeal Pipe & Foundry Co. v. HowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  3. Collins v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Hogan v. . UtterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Loftin v. . HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API