Legal Opinion
Tribble v. Bauer, Pogue & Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 15, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchreiber, J.
Motion to vacate the service of the summons on the defendant corporation is denied. This motion presents an interesting problem as to the power and effect of section 216 of the General Corporation Law. The conceded facts are these: The defendant corporation was a Delaware corporation; in 1933 it obtained in New York State a certificate of authority to do business here as a foreign corporation; in 1937, the defendant corporation was duly dissolved in Delaware, the State of its creation. Under the Delaware law a dissolved corporation is continued for a term of three years after its dissolution…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Bagdon v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Clark v. WilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Dehne v. Hillman Investment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Johnson v. Helicopter & Airplane Services Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1975
- Tribble v. Bauer, Pogue & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944