Legal Opinion

Narum v. Cheatham

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1932No. Docket No. 7494PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

In this action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting to plaintiff by reason of negligence of the defendant, the complaint was filed and summons issued April 17, 1926. On August 3, 1926, an order for publication of summons was signed and filed. This order was granted upon the sole ground that from the affidavit of the plaintiff filed therewith it satisfactorily appeared to the judge that the defendant “cannot after due diligence be found within this state”; that the complaint showed a good cause of action; that summons had been duly issued and that personal service thereof could…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Morgan v. ClappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Porter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fielding v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CITY AND CTY. OF SFCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Allen v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Batte v. BandyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Sanford v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Eagle Electric Mfg. Co. v. KeenerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API