Legal Opinion
People v. Crudgington
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 15, 1979No. Crim. 10038PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
Defendant Diane Crudgington was charged by information with one count of welfare fraud (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 11483, subd. (2)—cash assistance for a child in excess of $200). Her motion to set aside the information made pursuant to Penal Code section 995 was granted. The People appeal pursuant to Penal Code section 1238, subdivision (a)(1)-
The sole ground upon which the trial court set aside the information was that the People did not introduce at the preliminary hearing any evidence that a request for restitution had been made upon defendant prior to the filing of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. TewksburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Murgia v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Jennings v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lexin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. MacKeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Stanton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Currie v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Harris v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.