Legal Opinion

United States v. Private E-2 ANDREW L. GEAN

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided April 30, 2012No. ARMY 20100499Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

KRAUSS, Judge:

(Part I — Findings)

A military judge, sitting as a special court-martial empowered to adjudge a bad-conduct discharge, convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of two specifications of absence without leave (AWOL) in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 886 (2006) [hereinafter UCMJ], Contrary to appellant’s pleas, the military judge convicted him of three specifications of communicating a threat in violation of Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 934. Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2008 ed.) [hereinafter MCM ], pt.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. CottonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. SchmidtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  3. United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  4. United States v. WrightNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API