Legal Opinion

Horace S. Daley and Lawrence J. Talarico v. Arthur J. Wiltshire

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 17, 1961No. Patent Appeal 6687PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority to Wiltshire on two grounds: (1) that Daley et al. could not make the count in interference and (2) that Daley et al. derived the invention in issue from Wiltshire.

Wiltshire, the junior party, appellee here, was employed by Apex Electrical Manufacturing Company (hereinafter called Apex) to whom the application involved was first assigned, a later assignment being to the White Sewing Machine Company which purchased Apex in 1956. Wiltshire’s application, Ser. No. 362,898, filed June 19, 1953, is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beall v. OrmsbyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Application of Oliver Kenneth KelleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  2. Godtfredsen v. BannerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  3. Harold S. Hemstreet v. William S. RohlandCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  4. Weiss v. RoschkeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  5. Godtfredsen v. BannerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API