Legal Opinion
Beall v. Ormsby
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 1, 1946No. 5031; No. 5032PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGaeeett, Presiding Judge
These are companion cases in which appeals were taken by the party Beall, from decisions of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office awarding priority to the party Ormsby upon counts involved in two interference proceedings.
Both interferences were declared, so far as Beall and Ormsby are concerned, between the same applications. The Beall application, serial No. 287,424, was filed July 29, 1939, and is not assigned. The Ormsby application, serial No. 256,947, which appears to have been assigned to his employer, the Clark Equipment Company, of Buchanan, Michigan,…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Hedgewick v. AkersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Anderson v. AndersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.