Legal Opinion

Doe v. Roe

Nassau County District Court

Decided January 15, 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Kenneth L. Gartner, J.

In the instant case, the defendant attorney does not dispute that he charged and collected from the plaintiff client a fee prohibited by the New York State Labor Law. The defendant attorney does not dispute that he has been ordered to make restitution by the New York State Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board (the Board). The defendant attorney concedes that he has failed and refused to comply with this order. The attorney instead raises a statute of limitations defense to this small claims action — the same statute of limitations defense which he…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Glamm v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Gaidon v. Guardian Life Insurance of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. United States Power Squadrons v. State Human Rights Appeal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Yeiser v. DysartSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. United States Power Squadrons v. State Human Rights Appeal BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API