Legal Opinion
Gilliam v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 19, 1998No. 95-CF-537PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON REHEARING EN BANC
2Per curiam
We granted rehearing en bane without oral argument in this case to iron out remaining differences in our decisions that relate to the correct standard of appellate review in criminal cases when the trial court has failed sua sponte to instruct the jury on the limited use of evidence properly admitted for one purpose but not another. In good part the dispute is over the continuing vitality of United States v. McClain, 142 U.S.App. D.C. 213, 440 F.2d 241 (1971), a decision originally binding on divisions of this court. See M.A.P. v. Ryan, 285 A.2d 310, 312 (D.C.1971).…
3Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- Presley v. Commercial Moving & Rigging, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Coleman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Velasquez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Wilson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.