Legal Opinion

Velasquez v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 20, 2002No. 00-CF-297PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAGNER, Chief Judge.

Appellant, Didiar Velasquez, was convicted following a jury trial of assault with intent to commit first-degree sexual abuse, D.C.Code § 22-501 (1981) (recodified as D.C.Code § 22-401 (2001)); and threatening to injure a person, D.C.Code § 22-2307 (1981) (recodified as D.C.Code § 22-1810 (2001)). 1 He argues for reversal on the principal ground that the trial court violated his Sixth Amendment right to confront the witness against him by limiting his cross-examination of the complaining witness. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

I

The charges arose out of an incident…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Harrison v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Roy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Tyer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Reyes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API