Legal Opinion

Young v. Seling

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 11, 2003No. 01-35697; D.C. No. CV-98-05351-RJBPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Appellant Andre Young filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 arguing a violation of his constitutional rights. Specifically, Young contends that the Special Commitment Center (“SCC”) violated his constitutional rights by monitoring his telephone calls and for denying his incoming and outgoing telephone calls from April 18 through September 24,1998, when Young’s sister was terminally ill.

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we REVERSE the district court’s order granting summary judgment for the defendants. Further, we hold that the defendants are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Charles M. KEENAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank HALL, Director Oregon Department of Corrections, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Eric D. Oliver v. Jerry Keller, Sheriff Kyle Edwards Dave SwiekertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Strandberg v. City Of HelenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API